CICS must be brought into
line with inflation, says APIL 04 November 2005 |
Personal injury lawyers have labelled
the current criminal injuries compensation scheme (CICS)
“inflexible and unfair” and called for the payment cap
to be abolished.
The President of the Association of
Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL), Allan Gore QC (pictured
right), said he is seeking a meeting with the government
to discuss a complete overhaul of the scheme. The CICS,
which has a maximum cap of £500,000 per case, was
introduced in 1996 to compensate victims of crime.
Gore said: “Before the scheme was set
up, someone who suffered a brain injury because of a
violent crime could expect to receive around £2 million
in compensation,” he said. “Yet today, someone who
suffers exactly the same injury, in exactly the same
circumstances, will be awarded only a quarter of that
amount through the criminal injuries scheme.”
Gore said APIL believes the scheme is
completely out of line with compensation awarded through
the civil courts and that its tariff bands should at
least be assessed annually so that awards are kept in
line with inflation.
“This money is awarded to restore
some quality of life to someone injured through no fault
of their own; to pay for any care they may need on a day
to day basis; to help them try to regain some sort of
normality,” he said. “Yet the scheme leaves many, many
people under-compensated with little chance of getting
their lives back.”
|